Protestant Separatist Official Site:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUlWpqLsOVs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwAryVVF8FE&feature=watch_response
http://www.youtube.com/user/protestantsep#p/u/56/Ssy1ZKwlbT0
I wondered , "Why the Hell is there so much Satanic behavior in the Hoosier state" and then I stumbled upon this site . Indiana supplied most the granite and limestone for the construction of Washington D.C. and you have politicians like Mitch Daniels , Dan Quayle , Dick Luger , Orin Hatch , Dan Coats and many more "Masons". That's why J.F.K. was assassinated , because he "grew" a conscience about "secret" societies running/ruining America . don't get me wrong , EVERYONE of Kentucky's politicians are of the same "reptilian" blood .The "secret" papers of "The Apotheosis of Indiana" and Washington were in the sculptures studio that got hit by the engine off the airplane that hit the Empire State Building , coincidentally the time the airplane hit the Empire State Building was 9:49am , which was very close to 9/11 and the same time World Trade Center Tower 1 was hit . But , whats of significance here is the "Secret Papers" in Henry Herings studio regarding the "Apotheosis of Indiana" that supposedly were destroyed and "no other copies exist" , yeah right ! And that's the "gods"(?) honest truth ! (again I ask "who's god"?)
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Sunday, November 14, 2010
HEY ! Calling ALL "soveriegns" ..aka : Gods Creations....
Go to www.RedemptionService.com and learn what the this Fascist government does not want you to know . Warning DO NOT right click on anything or copy and paste or they will block you from returning to the web site. ....stay vigilant and abolish this Illegal Subversive Terrorist Government ...Karl
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
S.O.S. .......CALLING ON ALL CITIZEN SOLDIERS........ DEMAND THE RELEASE OF AN INNOCENT MAN !
A Malicious Prosecution
By Bradford Metcalf
In a time of political unrest in our nation, I associated with what I thought was a group of like-minded individuals. It turned out that the only thing these people all had in common was a desire for a return of the Constitution of the United States. This group was what is called the militia by both the press and by legal definition.
I was a firearms hobbyist, having been a federally licensed firearms dealer for 6 years. I was a competitive shooter, reloader, amateur machinist and tinkerer.
I, like many other Americans, loved my country, however, didn’t like what I saw was going on with the mis-administration of our government. I understood that those misadministrators not only were a threat to our liberties but to the whole civilization. This leadership had set America up as a target for any terrorist group. These leaders had made the whole world distrust and hate America.
Though I had been a Boy Scout for only a short time, I had learned a vitally important lesson—Be Prepared. Most of the other like-minded associates had felt that preparedness was a good idea, as well. For what? Natural and man-made disasters, economic collapse and, oh yes, the old concern of our forefathers—tyranny.
So what did these like-minded individuals do? A small group of them would show up at my place to roll around in the dirt and weeds, dig holes in the ground, shoot at the target range and tell tales. I had 37 acres to play in and a good time was had by all.
Ken Carter became the commander of my group, not due to his wonderful leadership skills, but because Carter had emphysema, a heart condition, and a bad back. He didn’t work. He loved to talk on the phone and watch the news. Carter could be depended upon to call up members of the group to show up for training - a time consuming chore in itself.
Carter had an attitude about government infringement of American rights. Alot of people do - at least those that could see what has happened to those rights. No one in this group thought that having an opinion was criminal. Carter, myself and others were soon to find out otherwise.
In August, 1997, after three botched attempts, the BATF and FBI, assisted by the Michigan State Police, conducted a raid on my rural home. The State Police pulled me over for a “traffic stop”. An ATF-SRT member “detained” me at gun point. Shortly, 70+ agents were swarming over my house. I had warning that the ATF would eventually be coming, so I carefully checked over everything I had and determined I had nothing illegal. That didn’t seem to slow down the ATF, in the slightest.
My wife, and her children, were at home, during this time. My 17-year-old stepdaughter was “frisked” by a male ATF agent who, when done feeling her to his satisfaciton, pulled her waistband out and looked down into her shorts. One has to wonder what he was looking for—machine guns?
ATF “special agent” Mark Semear, told me they had found three machineguns. I told Semear that what they had found were LEGALLY purchased parts sets - that a completed right sideplate (of which I did not possess) is what constitutes a machinegun. Thirty minutes later, after calling their office, Semear led a group of agents into the house, with the battle cry, “we are going in for the sideplates!”
I asked twice for an attorney and was twice refused. ATF’s response—“you haven’t been arrested, only detained”. After eight hours of rummaging through my personal belongings, ATF secured another warrant - this time for all legal-to-own items. I watched in disgust as ATF carried my gun collection of 28 LEGAL firearms out to their cars, along with my computer, software, videos, and armloads of my personal property.
Seven months later, March, 1998, I, Carter and another man, Randy Graham. were arrested. I speculate that this was precipitated by the fact that Agent Semear knew he was about to be sued, for the return of my legal firearms.
All three defendants were arraigned and given a preliminary exam. NO indictment had yet been delivered. No bond was set, due to the defendants being “too dangerous”. One has to ask, “if they were so dangerous, why did ATF wait for 7 months to arrest them?” (On the stand, Agent Semear stated that they had to plan the arrest. But, 7 months??)
In the eight months that it took to go to trial, a number of interesting things happened. Seventeen pre-trial motions had been filed. None were answered promptly by the judge. After Graham and Carter had agreed to a plea, I was locked up in solitary confinement, unable to do any legal research, or make contact with family or legal counsel. It appears that Special Investigative Agent Weber, at Milan Federal Detention Center, had conspired with Assistant U.S. Attorney Lloyd K. Meyer, to isolate me and thereby break my will in order to force me to take a plea bargain. Meyer offered me a 3-year “bargain”, but I refused, asserting my innocence. Meyer had political aspirations, and he expected three “easy marks” that would make him a hero in the legal and political arena.
I held out and the elections passed. Graham was told that he would have to lie about me in order to get his “bargain”—a guaranteed 5 year sentence. Graham refused to lie, and for this he was sentenced to 55 years in federal prison.
Carter, on the other hand, not only “got on the bus”, but he also agreed to become an informant, “ratted” on everyone he had ever met, and would probably have, if given the chance, sell out his mother for a dime. His agreement was for a (new heart and two lungs) transplant, and back surgery. I found that Carter only received a bypass and one lung.
It came out at my trial, that Carter had been conspiring with an undercover ATF agent for months, to start a war with the federal government. Since Carter never testified, this was all hearsay evidence. At trial, Judge Richard Alan Enslen, the Chief Judge in the Western District of Michigan, chose to ignore that little fact. Before proceeding further, I should note that Judge Enslen had numerous forbidden, unethical one-sided (ex parte) communications with the investigating agents, at which time Judge Enslen was told that my group had planned on killing him and the other federal judges. Not only was this a lie, but I was never given an opportunity to rebut the accusation. This judge, obviously, was biased against me, before he ever laid eyes upon me.
Judge Enslen ignored everything that was inconvenient to getting a conviction. He ignored Graham’s affidavit about the coercion, intimidation, and subornation of perjury by Assistant U.S. Attorney Meyer, in trying to obtain a plea bargain from him. He cancelled my evidentiary hearing pertaining to Graham. When I asked what type of conspiracy charge (1,2,3, or 4 element) I had to defend against, Judge Enslen replied, “ask your attorney.” (I had appeared pro se).
Judge Enslen disallowed about 1% of Meyer’s evidence against me. My objections to hearsay and/or irrelevance went unheeded. When it came time for me to admit my evidence, Judge Enslen disallowed everything except the previously played audio tapes (that had been cut and edited) of the government telephone tap. Judge Enslen also disallowed my expert witnesses.
My evidence consisted of letters, advertisements from commercial publications, government statements, and government publications. All of it was admissable evidence—if the judge had wanted it to be. All of it was intended to show my innocence, however, none of it was allowed by Judge Enslen.
Judge Enslen told the jury a nice little story about a visit to a prison which brought him face to face with one of his previous victims. This victim was his tour guide. She explained how the six-year sentence he gave her, had given her the opportunity to get her life together, beat her drug addiction and reconcile herself with her family. This was the equivalent of saying, “go ahead and convict Metcalf—a couple of years behind bars will, once again, make him a useful member of society.” Judge Enslen didn’t care that I was a family man, had been working full time at Kellogg’s, in Battle Creek, for 10 years, prior to my arrest, or the fact that I had no prior criminal history.
I neglected to request a jury instruction, however, Judge Enslen should have included one, to inform the jury that if I had made a showing of withdrawal from the alleged conspiracy, I could be acquitted of that charge. I tried to produce evidence to support the “withdrawal defense”. The problem was, no evidence had ever been presented by the prosecutor, to prove any conspiracy by me. Judge Enslen chose to ignore that fact, as well. When I asked for a Rule 29 Motion to Dismiss (for lack of evidence), he could have dismissed the whole case, at that time—and he should have.
Judge Enslen had been shown that the alleged silencer was actually a rifle barrel extension. He had been shown the statute that stated the “destructive device” was a legal signalling device. He had also been requested by me to force the prosecution to supply video footage of the alleged machineguns. In short, Judge Enslen knew I was NOT guilty of any of the charges placed against me.
Judge Enslen, without any federal law to support him, told the jury, “something to consider here is, were Metcalf’s weapons where they were accessible to children, were they loaded, and were they on safety?” This statement was absolutely inappropriate.
When Judge Enslen was asked to give a jury instruction pertaining to the word “readily” (to readily convert into a machinegun) as used in the statutes that I supposedly had violated, Judge Enslen gave a dictionary definition without specifying a time frame. The use of the word “readily” can generally be considered to be about ONE MINUTE (see e.g. 18 U.S.C., 926A Interstate Transportations of Firearms, or 26 U.S.C., 5842 Identification of Firearms). It was obvious that I could not “readily” assemble a functional weapon from the parts sets.
Throughout trial, Judge Enslen continously attributed ALL of Carter’s statements (from the telephone tapes), to me, even though I had never even heard most of those statements. When it became apparent to me that the only law that Judge Enslen paid any attention to was “case law” (previously decided cases), I cited two Supreme Court cases that should have caused a dismissal of everything but the conspiracy charge. However, once again, Judge Enslen decided to ignore me, and these court cases.
Judge Enslen had been asked to suppress my seized gun collection as evidence, due to the firearms being ALL legally owned and configured. However, the collection was paraded in front of the jury to prejudice them. The prosecutor alleged, “why else would he have all these guns except to wage war against the government?” The jury, as I predicted, bought it.
I had asked for an expert witness, however, was told that if I had had a lawyer, I could have had an expert appointed. Continuously, through trial, Judge Enslen “begged” me to take HIS (Enslen’s) attorney.
After I examined one of my (out of two) witnesses, Prosecutor Lloyd K. Meyer started his cross examination and then called for a recess. Meyer then grabbed his friend, ATF agent Semear, and proceeded into the foyer to question and intimidate my witness. When I found out what had happened, I brought it to the attention of Judge Enslen. Judge Enslen had a “hearing” (without the jury in the courtroom), to see if any damage had been done. After listening to the witness state that he had, in fact, been intimidated, Judge Enslen declared that no harm had been done. In fact, Judge Enslen compared the sizes of the prosecutor and ATF agent, to the size of the “tampered” witness. Since the witness was much larger in physical size, Judge Enslen couldn’t understand how he could have felt intimidated by two federal law enforcement agents. So much for the obvious witness tampering and intimidation.
After my closing statement, Judge Enslen told the jury to ignore my comments regarding the Second Amendment and other constitutional issues.
Judge Enslen, twice, instructed the jury, that in order to find me guilty of conspiracy, they must unanimously find me guilty of at least one of the four offenses charged. Judge Enslen then supplied the jury with a verdict form that allowed a general verdict - leaving me without any idea of what I was convicted of, or how to appeal it.
Throughout trial, Judge Enslen made it quite clear that he hadn’t read any of my pre-trial motions. He ruled on my pre-trial motions (all 17 of them denied), with several motions challenging the sufficiency of the indictment—however, a month later, stating for the record, “I haven’t even read the indictment, I don’t know what you are charged with.”
At sentencing, Judge Enslen “over-ruled” all of my objections to the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSIR). Under the sentencing Statue [F.R.Cr.P. Rule 32(c)], the judge, for each matter in controversy, MUST make either a finding on the allegation, or the matter won’t affect sentencing. Judge Enslen did neither. I objected to almost every issue in the PSIR, due to inaccuracies, irrelevance (most of the report was about conspirator Ken Carter), or unproven allegations at trial.
He sustained my argument about trust ownership of my house, but then ruled that I could sell my house in order to pay for transcripts to effect my appeal. Judge Enslen also made unsolicited psychiatric evaluations from his bench.
When I commented on Blackstone’s commentaries on the common law, Judge Enslen stated he had always disagreed with Blackstone. It is well known, Blackstone is/was the accepted defacto authority on common law.
At my sentencing hearing, (May, 1999), I argued my “use of a firearm in the commission of a violent crime” (18 U.S.C. 924(c)), according to the Sentencing Guidelines, should NOT be the mandatory 30 years (for “machineguns”), as prosecutor Lloyd Meyer had requested, nor the mandatory 10 years (for a “semiautomatic assault weapon”) as Judge Enslen eventually ruled—but a mandatory 5 years (for a “firearm”), because I was convicted of “use or carry” of a firearm. Judge Enslen told me that I should feel lucky. I had just saved 20 years of my life (sentencing me to 40 years, instead of 60 years), by successfully arguing that machineguns were not used in the “violent crime” (according to Judge Enslen, having a political opinion is a violent crime). NOW I will be released when I am 87 years old, instead of being 107 years old. In other words, Judge Enslen had sentenced me to 40 years without parole for having LEGAL firearms—a virtual sentence of life in prison!!
When I asked the court for my right to have a copy of the trial transcripts, I was refused. I didn’t find out why until after the appeal was filed. Normally a prisoner is considered indigent unless proven otherwise. However, not in this case.
I appealed.
During the several extensions of time requested by prosecutor Lloyd K. Meyer (and granted), to respond to my appeal, Meyer wrote a letter to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that I had been found guilty of “conspiring to murder the governor of Michigan, a federal senator, and Western District of Michigan federal judges, as well as to blow up the Federal Building in Battle Creek.” Not only were these allegations NOT proven at trial—but they were never alleged!!!
It didn’t take much for the appeals court to shoot my appeal down. The trouble is, not only did NO judge see this appeal, but a law clerk obviously wrote the opinion based solely on the brief of the prosecutor, and the “extension” letter, since both had been repeated verbatim on the opinion. Since Meyer didn’t address any of my issues head-on, NONE of my issues were addressed in the opinion, as well. NO relief was given to me, at all.
Quite obviously, NO Artcle III judge had ever seen my paperwork, so I sent a complete briefing package to one of the alleged judges on the appeal. The Honorable Martha Daughtrey in Nashville, Tennessee, had no comment, whatsoever.
I then petitioned the Supreme Court to hear my case. I was shot down on December 11, 2000—coincidently, at the exact time the election case of Bush v. Gore was being heard. I wondered how a Supreme Court could be paying attention to my case (decide it’s worthiness to be heard by them), when the Justices were tied up with chosing a president and making history. The answer was simple—The law clerks, again, had denied me.
I petitioned for a rehearing. Again, I was denied—by the law clerks, since the Justices were on “holiday recess” from the decision of Bush v. Gore. Since Justices Thomas and Scalia have practically begged for a pure Second Amendment case for years, their comments must have been either pure rhetoric
At some point after trial, I was looking through the Grand Jury transcripts. I noticed that FBI agent Robert Jones had commented to a grand juror about “briefing” Judge Enslen several times. These briefings were about my group and how we had “targeted” the judge. This is ex parte communication. It is wholly unethical and forbidden. It was also a lie. Normally, it will get a new trial or possibly a dismissal of the indictment. However, not in this case. It was a complete deprivation of my right to meet my accuser.
My family scraped together enough money to have an attorney prepare a habeas corpus petition under 28 USC, 2255.
I submitted a motion for the judge to recuse himself from this case, considering the extrajudicial source of apparent bias from the exparte communication. When confronted with the actual evidence, Judge Enslen “danced around it” by saying he could talk to marshals anytime. True to form, he slam-dunked my 2255 motion, and the Motion to Recuse, as well as denied me a Certificate of Appealability. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied me of my “right” to a certificate of appealability. It was my “right”, due to my having met the requirements specified by law.
I petitioned the Supreme Court, clearly demonstrating the miscarriage of justice and Kangaroo Court adjudications. Since petitions for certiorary are “discretionary”, I was, again, denied my day in court.
I later filed a pair of motions with the original district court. One of those motions was another motion requesting Judge Enslen to recuse himself (for the fourth time). The other motion showed fraud by the prosecutor—68 (known) ethics violations. Judge Enslen denied the recusal motion and transfered the fraud motion to the appeals court for me to request a certificate of appealability. Both the judge and I knew that the motion did not qualify as a habeas corpus petition (therefore, also not qualifying for a certificate of appealability). I appealed Judge Enslen’s decision.
I filed my notice of appeal as a matter of right, asking for a docket number and briefing schedule. I received neither. After numerous letters and phone calls, I finally, out of frustration, simply filed an appeal brief. The brief was promptly returned to me, with no explanation.
I filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the U.S. Supreme Court. This is an “extraordinary writ”, meaning that it is rarely issued, except when all other avenues of relief have been exhausted. The mandamus is an order from a higher court to force (usually) a lower court to do it’s job. I qualified. The Supreme Court simply refused to grant me my day in court (for the fourth time). I have been before the courts 14 times, (District, Appellate, Supreme Courts), with NO adjudication on my issues.
I filed a moton for the return of my property, (approximately $50,000 worth of legal firearms), in January, 2005. Judge Enslen denied the return of those firearms in July/August, 2005, after having stated in an earlier order, that I could designate someone to receive them. This latest action represents the final deprivation of all my material possessions, by the federal government. I am currently in appeal of those denials.
In January, 2005, I filed a Petition for Clemency, (pardon request), with President Bush, via the Pardon Attorney, at the U.S. Department of Justice. I was informed that most clemency request investigations take 18-24 months. I would appreciate any reasonable letter written to the President, requesting a pardon on my behalf. Making mention of this gross miscarriage of justice, would be helpful.
Although this has been a “cornucopia of government misconduct”, these are the tactics which are used on a daily basis to ensure convictions in many, if not most, federal courtrooms. Where does it end?
By Bradford Metcalf
Definitions: Malicious Prosecution. One begun in malice without probable cause to believe the charges can be sustained...Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.The following story is an example of federal prosecution. It is not an exception, but the rule, of what happens in federal courtrooms on a daily basis.
Kangaroo Court. Term descriptive of a sham legal proceeding in which a person’s rights are totally disregarded and in which the result is a foregone conclusion because of the bias of the court or other tribunal.
In a time of political unrest in our nation, I associated with what I thought was a group of like-minded individuals. It turned out that the only thing these people all had in common was a desire for a return of the Constitution of the United States. This group was what is called the militia by both the press and by legal definition.
I was a firearms hobbyist, having been a federally licensed firearms dealer for 6 years. I was a competitive shooter, reloader, amateur machinist and tinkerer.
I, like many other Americans, loved my country, however, didn’t like what I saw was going on with the mis-administration of our government. I understood that those misadministrators not only were a threat to our liberties but to the whole civilization. This leadership had set America up as a target for any terrorist group. These leaders had made the whole world distrust and hate America.
Though I had been a Boy Scout for only a short time, I had learned a vitally important lesson—Be Prepared. Most of the other like-minded associates had felt that preparedness was a good idea, as well. For what? Natural and man-made disasters, economic collapse and, oh yes, the old concern of our forefathers—tyranny.
So what did these like-minded individuals do? A small group of them would show up at my place to roll around in the dirt and weeds, dig holes in the ground, shoot at the target range and tell tales. I had 37 acres to play in and a good time was had by all.
Ken Carter became the commander of my group, not due to his wonderful leadership skills, but because Carter had emphysema, a heart condition, and a bad back. He didn’t work. He loved to talk on the phone and watch the news. Carter could be depended upon to call up members of the group to show up for training - a time consuming chore in itself.
Carter had an attitude about government infringement of American rights. Alot of people do - at least those that could see what has happened to those rights. No one in this group thought that having an opinion was criminal. Carter, myself and others were soon to find out otherwise.
In August, 1997, after three botched attempts, the BATF and FBI, assisted by the Michigan State Police, conducted a raid on my rural home. The State Police pulled me over for a “traffic stop”. An ATF-SRT member “detained” me at gun point. Shortly, 70+ agents were swarming over my house. I had warning that the ATF would eventually be coming, so I carefully checked over everything I had and determined I had nothing illegal. That didn’t seem to slow down the ATF, in the slightest.
My wife, and her children, were at home, during this time. My 17-year-old stepdaughter was “frisked” by a male ATF agent who, when done feeling her to his satisfaciton, pulled her waistband out and looked down into her shorts. One has to wonder what he was looking for—machine guns?
ATF “special agent” Mark Semear, told me they had found three machineguns. I told Semear that what they had found were LEGALLY purchased parts sets - that a completed right sideplate (of which I did not possess) is what constitutes a machinegun. Thirty minutes later, after calling their office, Semear led a group of agents into the house, with the battle cry, “we are going in for the sideplates!”
I asked twice for an attorney and was twice refused. ATF’s response—“you haven’t been arrested, only detained”. After eight hours of rummaging through my personal belongings, ATF secured another warrant - this time for all legal-to-own items. I watched in disgust as ATF carried my gun collection of 28 LEGAL firearms out to their cars, along with my computer, software, videos, and armloads of my personal property.
Seven months later, March, 1998, I, Carter and another man, Randy Graham. were arrested. I speculate that this was precipitated by the fact that Agent Semear knew he was about to be sued, for the return of my legal firearms.
All three defendants were arraigned and given a preliminary exam. NO indictment had yet been delivered. No bond was set, due to the defendants being “too dangerous”. One has to ask, “if they were so dangerous, why did ATF wait for 7 months to arrest them?” (On the stand, Agent Semear stated that they had to plan the arrest. But, 7 months??)
In the eight months that it took to go to trial, a number of interesting things happened. Seventeen pre-trial motions had been filed. None were answered promptly by the judge. After Graham and Carter had agreed to a plea, I was locked up in solitary confinement, unable to do any legal research, or make contact with family or legal counsel. It appears that Special Investigative Agent Weber, at Milan Federal Detention Center, had conspired with Assistant U.S. Attorney Lloyd K. Meyer, to isolate me and thereby break my will in order to force me to take a plea bargain. Meyer offered me a 3-year “bargain”, but I refused, asserting my innocence. Meyer had political aspirations, and he expected three “easy marks” that would make him a hero in the legal and political arena.
I held out and the elections passed. Graham was told that he would have to lie about me in order to get his “bargain”—a guaranteed 5 year sentence. Graham refused to lie, and for this he was sentenced to 55 years in federal prison.
Carter, on the other hand, not only “got on the bus”, but he also agreed to become an informant, “ratted” on everyone he had ever met, and would probably have, if given the chance, sell out his mother for a dime. His agreement was for a (new heart and two lungs) transplant, and back surgery. I found that Carter only received a bypass and one lung.
It came out at my trial, that Carter had been conspiring with an undercover ATF agent for months, to start a war with the federal government. Since Carter never testified, this was all hearsay evidence. At trial, Judge Richard Alan Enslen, the Chief Judge in the Western District of Michigan, chose to ignore that little fact. Before proceeding further, I should note that Judge Enslen had numerous forbidden, unethical one-sided (ex parte) communications with the investigating agents, at which time Judge Enslen was told that my group had planned on killing him and the other federal judges. Not only was this a lie, but I was never given an opportunity to rebut the accusation. This judge, obviously, was biased against me, before he ever laid eyes upon me.
Judge Enslen ignored everything that was inconvenient to getting a conviction. He ignored Graham’s affidavit about the coercion, intimidation, and subornation of perjury by Assistant U.S. Attorney Meyer, in trying to obtain a plea bargain from him. He cancelled my evidentiary hearing pertaining to Graham. When I asked what type of conspiracy charge (1,2,3, or 4 element) I had to defend against, Judge Enslen replied, “ask your attorney.” (I had appeared pro se).
Judge Enslen disallowed about 1% of Meyer’s evidence against me. My objections to hearsay and/or irrelevance went unheeded. When it came time for me to admit my evidence, Judge Enslen disallowed everything except the previously played audio tapes (that had been cut and edited) of the government telephone tap. Judge Enslen also disallowed my expert witnesses.
My evidence consisted of letters, advertisements from commercial publications, government statements, and government publications. All of it was admissable evidence—if the judge had wanted it to be. All of it was intended to show my innocence, however, none of it was allowed by Judge Enslen.
Judge Enslen told the jury a nice little story about a visit to a prison which brought him face to face with one of his previous victims. This victim was his tour guide. She explained how the six-year sentence he gave her, had given her the opportunity to get her life together, beat her drug addiction and reconcile herself with her family. This was the equivalent of saying, “go ahead and convict Metcalf—a couple of years behind bars will, once again, make him a useful member of society.” Judge Enslen didn’t care that I was a family man, had been working full time at Kellogg’s, in Battle Creek, for 10 years, prior to my arrest, or the fact that I had no prior criminal history.
I neglected to request a jury instruction, however, Judge Enslen should have included one, to inform the jury that if I had made a showing of withdrawal from the alleged conspiracy, I could be acquitted of that charge. I tried to produce evidence to support the “withdrawal defense”. The problem was, no evidence had ever been presented by the prosecutor, to prove any conspiracy by me. Judge Enslen chose to ignore that fact, as well. When I asked for a Rule 29 Motion to Dismiss (for lack of evidence), he could have dismissed the whole case, at that time—and he should have.
Judge Enslen had been shown that the alleged silencer was actually a rifle barrel extension. He had been shown the statute that stated the “destructive device” was a legal signalling device. He had also been requested by me to force the prosecution to supply video footage of the alleged machineguns. In short, Judge Enslen knew I was NOT guilty of any of the charges placed against me.
Judge Enslen, without any federal law to support him, told the jury, “something to consider here is, were Metcalf’s weapons where they were accessible to children, were they loaded, and were they on safety?” This statement was absolutely inappropriate.
When Judge Enslen was asked to give a jury instruction pertaining to the word “readily” (to readily convert into a machinegun) as used in the statutes that I supposedly had violated, Judge Enslen gave a dictionary definition without specifying a time frame. The use of the word “readily” can generally be considered to be about ONE MINUTE (see e.g. 18 U.S.C., 926A Interstate Transportations of Firearms, or 26 U.S.C., 5842 Identification of Firearms). It was obvious that I could not “readily” assemble a functional weapon from the parts sets.
Throughout trial, Judge Enslen continously attributed ALL of Carter’s statements (from the telephone tapes), to me, even though I had never even heard most of those statements. When it became apparent to me that the only law that Judge Enslen paid any attention to was “case law” (previously decided cases), I cited two Supreme Court cases that should have caused a dismissal of everything but the conspiracy charge. However, once again, Judge Enslen decided to ignore me, and these court cases.
Judge Enslen had been asked to suppress my seized gun collection as evidence, due to the firearms being ALL legally owned and configured. However, the collection was paraded in front of the jury to prejudice them. The prosecutor alleged, “why else would he have all these guns except to wage war against the government?” The jury, as I predicted, bought it.
I had asked for an expert witness, however, was told that if I had had a lawyer, I could have had an expert appointed. Continuously, through trial, Judge Enslen “begged” me to take HIS (Enslen’s) attorney.
After I examined one of my (out of two) witnesses, Prosecutor Lloyd K. Meyer started his cross examination and then called for a recess. Meyer then grabbed his friend, ATF agent Semear, and proceeded into the foyer to question and intimidate my witness. When I found out what had happened, I brought it to the attention of Judge Enslen. Judge Enslen had a “hearing” (without the jury in the courtroom), to see if any damage had been done. After listening to the witness state that he had, in fact, been intimidated, Judge Enslen declared that no harm had been done. In fact, Judge Enslen compared the sizes of the prosecutor and ATF agent, to the size of the “tampered” witness. Since the witness was much larger in physical size, Judge Enslen couldn’t understand how he could have felt intimidated by two federal law enforcement agents. So much for the obvious witness tampering and intimidation.
After my closing statement, Judge Enslen told the jury to ignore my comments regarding the Second Amendment and other constitutional issues.
Judge Enslen, twice, instructed the jury, that in order to find me guilty of conspiracy, they must unanimously find me guilty of at least one of the four offenses charged. Judge Enslen then supplied the jury with a verdict form that allowed a general verdict - leaving me without any idea of what I was convicted of, or how to appeal it.
Throughout trial, Judge Enslen made it quite clear that he hadn’t read any of my pre-trial motions. He ruled on my pre-trial motions (all 17 of them denied), with several motions challenging the sufficiency of the indictment—however, a month later, stating for the record, “I haven’t even read the indictment, I don’t know what you are charged with.”
At sentencing, Judge Enslen “over-ruled” all of my objections to the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSIR). Under the sentencing Statue [F.R.Cr.P. Rule 32(c)], the judge, for each matter in controversy, MUST make either a finding on the allegation, or the matter won’t affect sentencing. Judge Enslen did neither. I objected to almost every issue in the PSIR, due to inaccuracies, irrelevance (most of the report was about conspirator Ken Carter), or unproven allegations at trial.
He sustained my argument about trust ownership of my house, but then ruled that I could sell my house in order to pay for transcripts to effect my appeal. Judge Enslen also made unsolicited psychiatric evaluations from his bench.
When I commented on Blackstone’s commentaries on the common law, Judge Enslen stated he had always disagreed with Blackstone. It is well known, Blackstone is/was the accepted defacto authority on common law.
At my sentencing hearing, (May, 1999), I argued my “use of a firearm in the commission of a violent crime” (18 U.S.C. 924(c)), according to the Sentencing Guidelines, should NOT be the mandatory 30 years (for “machineguns”), as prosecutor Lloyd Meyer had requested, nor the mandatory 10 years (for a “semiautomatic assault weapon”) as Judge Enslen eventually ruled—but a mandatory 5 years (for a “firearm”), because I was convicted of “use or carry” of a firearm. Judge Enslen told me that I should feel lucky. I had just saved 20 years of my life (sentencing me to 40 years, instead of 60 years), by successfully arguing that machineguns were not used in the “violent crime” (according to Judge Enslen, having a political opinion is a violent crime). NOW I will be released when I am 87 years old, instead of being 107 years old. In other words, Judge Enslen had sentenced me to 40 years without parole for having LEGAL firearms—a virtual sentence of life in prison!!
When I asked the court for my right to have a copy of the trial transcripts, I was refused. I didn’t find out why until after the appeal was filed. Normally a prisoner is considered indigent unless proven otherwise. However, not in this case.
I appealed.
During the several extensions of time requested by prosecutor Lloyd K. Meyer (and granted), to respond to my appeal, Meyer wrote a letter to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that I had been found guilty of “conspiring to murder the governor of Michigan, a federal senator, and Western District of Michigan federal judges, as well as to blow up the Federal Building in Battle Creek.” Not only were these allegations NOT proven at trial—but they were never alleged!!!
It didn’t take much for the appeals court to shoot my appeal down. The trouble is, not only did NO judge see this appeal, but a law clerk obviously wrote the opinion based solely on the brief of the prosecutor, and the “extension” letter, since both had been repeated verbatim on the opinion. Since Meyer didn’t address any of my issues head-on, NONE of my issues were addressed in the opinion, as well. NO relief was given to me, at all.
Quite obviously, NO Artcle III judge had ever seen my paperwork, so I sent a complete briefing package to one of the alleged judges on the appeal. The Honorable Martha Daughtrey in Nashville, Tennessee, had no comment, whatsoever.
I then petitioned the Supreme Court to hear my case. I was shot down on December 11, 2000—coincidently, at the exact time the election case of Bush v. Gore was being heard. I wondered how a Supreme Court could be paying attention to my case (decide it’s worthiness to be heard by them), when the Justices were tied up with chosing a president and making history. The answer was simple—The law clerks, again, had denied me.
I petitioned for a rehearing. Again, I was denied—by the law clerks, since the Justices were on “holiday recess” from the decision of Bush v. Gore. Since Justices Thomas and Scalia have practically begged for a pure Second Amendment case for years, their comments must have been either pure rhetoric
At some point after trial, I was looking through the Grand Jury transcripts. I noticed that FBI agent Robert Jones had commented to a grand juror about “briefing” Judge Enslen several times. These briefings were about my group and how we had “targeted” the judge. This is ex parte communication. It is wholly unethical and forbidden. It was also a lie. Normally, it will get a new trial or possibly a dismissal of the indictment. However, not in this case. It was a complete deprivation of my right to meet my accuser.
My family scraped together enough money to have an attorney prepare a habeas corpus petition under 28 USC, 2255.
I submitted a motion for the judge to recuse himself from this case, considering the extrajudicial source of apparent bias from the exparte communication. When confronted with the actual evidence, Judge Enslen “danced around it” by saying he could talk to marshals anytime. True to form, he slam-dunked my 2255 motion, and the Motion to Recuse, as well as denied me a Certificate of Appealability. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied me of my “right” to a certificate of appealability. It was my “right”, due to my having met the requirements specified by law.
I petitioned the Supreme Court, clearly demonstrating the miscarriage of justice and Kangaroo Court adjudications. Since petitions for certiorary are “discretionary”, I was, again, denied my day in court.
I later filed a pair of motions with the original district court. One of those motions was another motion requesting Judge Enslen to recuse himself (for the fourth time). The other motion showed fraud by the prosecutor—68 (known) ethics violations. Judge Enslen denied the recusal motion and transfered the fraud motion to the appeals court for me to request a certificate of appealability. Both the judge and I knew that the motion did not qualify as a habeas corpus petition (therefore, also not qualifying for a certificate of appealability). I appealed Judge Enslen’s decision.
I filed my notice of appeal as a matter of right, asking for a docket number and briefing schedule. I received neither. After numerous letters and phone calls, I finally, out of frustration, simply filed an appeal brief. The brief was promptly returned to me, with no explanation.
I filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the U.S. Supreme Court. This is an “extraordinary writ”, meaning that it is rarely issued, except when all other avenues of relief have been exhausted. The mandamus is an order from a higher court to force (usually) a lower court to do it’s job. I qualified. The Supreme Court simply refused to grant me my day in court (for the fourth time). I have been before the courts 14 times, (District, Appellate, Supreme Courts), with NO adjudication on my issues.
I filed a moton for the return of my property, (approximately $50,000 worth of legal firearms), in January, 2005. Judge Enslen denied the return of those firearms in July/August, 2005, after having stated in an earlier order, that I could designate someone to receive them. This latest action represents the final deprivation of all my material possessions, by the federal government. I am currently in appeal of those denials.
In January, 2005, I filed a Petition for Clemency, (pardon request), with President Bush, via the Pardon Attorney, at the U.S. Department of Justice. I was informed that most clemency request investigations take 18-24 months. I would appreciate any reasonable letter written to the President, requesting a pardon on my behalf. Making mention of this gross miscarriage of justice, would be helpful.
Re: Bradford Metcalf, #09198-040, Pardon PetitionAs of this writing, (October, 2006), I have now spent well over 8 years in a federal prison for a LEGAL gun collection and exercising my “right” to free speech, religion, association and petitioning the government for a redress of grievances. Since the beginning of this nightmare, I have lost my job, my home and property, and most of my personal possessions. I also went through a divorce, and lost custody, as well as contact, with my daughter.
c/o Mr. Roger C. Adams, Pardon Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
500 First Street, NW, 4th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20530
Although this has been a “cornucopia of government misconduct”, these are the tactics which are used on a daily basis to ensure convictions in many, if not most, federal courtrooms. Where does it end?
Bradford Metcalffootnote : There exists a case styled 98cv95 that Bradford Metcalf filed against Judges Danny Boggs /Boyce Martin / Simpson/Heyburn for R.I.C.O. / Bivens Act claims similar to Charles Schlund III , that has been "suppressed from the public , so if you ever find yourself in any Federal Corporate Court , demand that they produce that case for your proof that there "Racketeering" like the attorney Richard I Fine exposed in Los Angeles , California and is unlawfully imprisoned for. Stay vigilant and DEMAND TILL YOUR LAST BREATH , YOUR "GOD" GIVEN RIGHTS THAT AREN'T ENUMERATED IN THE CONSTITUTION ! Amen.
#09198-040
Federal Correctional Institution
Terre Haute, Indiana
"HEY" People , NOT al Quada ...but Remote Controlled "VAPORIZATION" !
EVENT - 8 / 11 NOVEMBER 2010
Please pass on -
tks - b.
"Dear BANZAI/Otto/Cletus/Bluesman/Planet et. al.:
While in City of London I was encouraged to 'communicate' in time window 8-11 Nov 10. Please upload this to any websites involved in 9/11 or global pedophile issues; they are related and the US DOJ has the first chance to expose this, England in second position in keeping with the Biblical model "the first shall be last and the last shall be first". Field McConnellwww.abeldanger.net "...all the Queen's horse and all the Queen's men are not sufficient to stop Agent Chips..." Chapter 14 will 'link' City of London and Senior Executive Service before 'the event'........""Captain Field McConnellN3572 County Road SPlum City WI 54761 Judge Rosemary M. CollyerUnited States District CourtDistrict of Columbia CC: www.abeldanger.net Re: Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC) 8 November, 2010 On 8 October, 2010 at 1412 an ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE no later than 8 November, 2010, was signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. It was sent to my PREVIOUS address in Glyndon, Minnesota. The Glyndon Post Office forwarded it to my Wisconsin residence and I received that forwarded post on 6 November, 2010, upon returning from London, England where I had been conferring with informed parties regarding mechanisms by which City of London (UK) and Senior Executive Service (US) appear to have conspired to deploy illegally modified airliners prior to 11 September, 2001 and continuing to present day. My Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED for these reasons: 1) Prior counsel James Q. Butler was disbarred after consuming 100% of a $7000 retainer, to the penny. 2) Prior counsel Chris Zampogna wished to be removed after consuming 100% of a $7000 retainer, to the penny. 3) In open court on 19 January, 2010 Judge Rosemary M. Collyer informed me that "due to my busyness, distance from the Court and frequent travel that I, Field McConnell, would not be required to appear in court in any future proceedings. 4) My second (failure of) counsel did not convey any requirement on my part to appear in court on 8 October, 2010 5) ALPA did not properly address my demands at time of my CONSTRUCTIVE DISCHARGE from Northwest Airlines specifically that ALPA WOULD PROVE THAT NWA NEVER HAD INFORMED ME OF THE APPOINTMENT with a known shill psychiatrist in Los Angeles. 6) Northwest Airlines had NEVER RESPONDED to ALPA Attorney Rob Plunkett's requests for proof that I had ever been notified of a requirement to attend a clinic visit to Dr. Elliott of Los Angeles. ALPA Attorney Plunkett's written requests, plural, were addressed to Chief Counsel of Northwest Airlines, who failed to respond in any way. ALPA failed to pursue that critical miscommunication or this would have been remedied long ago, in my opinion. 7) As early a 11 December, 2006, I have informed ALPA, ALPA President John Prater, Northwest Airlines, Northern Command/NORAD, FBI Director Mueller and FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt of the existence of BOEING UNINTERRUPTIBLE AUTOPILOT, QRS 11 GYRO CHIP, SMACSONIC INSULATION AND KU BAND FACILITY on aircraft illegally modified. Those illegally modified and illegally exported airliners were the basis of a June 2006 settlement between USDOJ and Boeing. Subsequent to my warning of 11 December, 2006, Adam Air 574 was vaporized on 1 January, 2007, consistent with my written warnings. Subsequent to a personal and electronically tracked letter to FBI Director Robert Swan Mueller III in which I warned ADAM AIR 574 WILL NOT BE THE LAST HULL LOSS Kenya Airways 507 was vaporized on 5 May, 2007, consistent with my warnings. I had asked to address these safety issues before Senator Byron Dorgan's Senate Aviation Safety meetings of 10 and 17 June, 2009 but before I could appear, Air France 447 was vaporized consistent with methodology in my warnings and Adam Air and Kenya vaporizations. 8) On 18 June, 2009, the day after I published online my offer to appear before Dorgan and his refusal of that offer, Attorney Butler contacted me at 1100 to ask if I would accept a $1.3 million settlement in Civil Case 1:08-1600 (RMC). I responded in writing that I would accept $4.552 million if settlement occurred by 8 September, 2009. That did not occur, therefore the settlement demand 'reset' to the original figure. 9) If the original claim of the Lawsuit is paid by end of business, 12 November, 2010, I will consider this civil case successful. 10) I have transmitted to intelligence communities globally that there may be a threat window for a FALSE FLAG AVIATION EVENT in the time frame 8-11 November, 2010. These reasons, and others, cause me to ask the Court to NOT DISMISS this case until the time window 8-11 November is over AND for 90 days following today, 8 November, 2010, to allow me to confer with Counsel of Record in Case [ 2011 AIR 00001 ] which also involves AVIATION SAFETY and apparent fraud, to determine if that attorney would join my PRO SE case or if I should accept PRO SE support offered already by three law offices in Texas or if I should vacate my case and join a criminal case as an EXPERT WITNESS. Further plaintiff sayeth not, Captain Field McConnellUnited States Naval Academy, 1971Lt Col, USAF, retiredwww.abeldanger.net218 329 6190 "
PLEASE PASS ON...tks...b
Sheriff John Aubrey ...Jefferson County Kentucky @ Louisville
I figure I'll put this in a public venue so as other constituents of yours can refer to this site and follow along . I intend on meeting with you , or one you delegate to assist me in exercising my 2nd Amendment right to "keep and bear "ARMS". I've already jumped through "ILLEGAL""hoops" to purchase the gun I already legally own . As you are well aware of the Constitution and its amendments that the 2nd Amendment "shall not be infringed upon", I've also been through the "carry conceal" "Program"(?) and had that "RIGHT" "infringed" upon by a corrupt judge , who had records destroyed , which was a FELONY and the "State" police also infringe upon that right ,because those records that were destroyed by a felonious judge , could have been used to HELP me "comply" with the "carry conceal" laws . I was told that since those records were destroyed , the remedy you require , is an affidavit from me stating the disposition of the "charges" that keeps me from (?) lawfully carrying an "ARM" (not FIRE-ARM) . I'm not ready to make a FEDERAL test case out of this yet , although in the future , when the moment presents itself , I will . I will be copying this in the form of a letter to be sent to you . I will be making a "BOND" CLAIM because of my Constitutional Rights being violated by "an act of Local (LOCO)government", please don't infringe on my rights and cause further harm to me . You are sworn to protect my Constitutional Rights , just as Don FitzGerald (who I voted for , if I was a felon , how would I be a registered voter ?) would have been fully aware of , as that was the platform he was running on . Even though I did not vote for you , never the less , I am still one of your "CONSTITUENTS". I pray you do the right thing in this pursuit of justice . As you know , even if I have a weapon on me for defense , it won't mean a thing if a "thug" with a gun has his OUT 1st . Your assistance in resolving this matter will be greatly appreciated and RESPECTED . sincerely... Karl
From Craigs List ....Rants and Raves ..10 november 2010
This in in the Canada Free Press
Of missiles & money - don’t ask, won’t tell
By Doug Hagmann Wednesday, November 10, 2010
A person of normal sensibilities would have to be intellectually numb, overly medicated or otherwise too preoccupied with keeping food on the table and the proverbial wolves from their door not to realize that there is something very, very wrong going on today. By now, most Americans have heard about the sighting of what appears to be a missile, and a big one at that, apparently being launched from a location about 35 miles off the coast of Los Angeles near sunset last evening. Video of the incident was taken from a KCBS news helicopter flying over the mainland at the time.
The manner in which this story unfolded should be a story by itself. The corporate media, quick to comment on the culturally indigenous dancing rituals of U.S. royalty, were quite slow on the uptake on an issue that has serious national security implications in light of our government’s response to this incident.
Today, Americans were treated with a number of explanations from our government officials, military pundits, and even media personalities about the incident. Those explanations range from the “embarrassing if true” to the “downright insulting,” with numerous variations in between. Ranging from having no information on the incident, to assurances that an investigation is underway, and my personal favorite, it is the contrail from an airplane that caused an optical illusion due to a problem of visual perspective, we are either in a boatload of trouble with regard to our national defense, or the hubris of the power elite is at an all time high.
As news of the event began to appear in the media, I contacted several well placed and trusted intelligence and military sources in an effort to determine the truth about the incident. These sources, as I was reminded by one during our conversation, are risking their careers to talk to me. And they talk to me not because of my charm or influence, both of which I admittedly lack, but because they care about the current status and future of our great country. And there is no better reason. I was less than reassured from what I learned today.
“There was an air of deep concern among the officials”
According to one source within the Pentagon, many of the top brass were in unscheduled, high level meetings throughout the day. Although he was not privy to the information imparted during these meetings, he told me that “there was an air of deep concern among the officials,” and all participants had a DAWT policy (don’t ask because I won’t tell) policy. Surreal was just one of the adjectives amply used by my Pentagon source.
At the very least, according to this source, it was a missile. As to whether it was ours or theirs, he does not know. But he said “they do,” a reference to the brass. The rumors circulating “within the [Pentagon] rings” suggest that it was a deliberate launch of a missile from “Chinese property at sea” intended as a warning to the U.S. Although it was odd that he would not clarify the nature of the “Chinese property,” I can only assume that it did not originate from Catalina Island or U.S. military ships in the area, as we still own those, at least to my knowledge.
A domestic intelligence source speaking to me off the record acknowledged the event by his assurances that it was indeed “some type of large missile” and not an illusion or model rocket. This, according to information from his superiors, who are deeply rooted inside the beltway. He provided a lot of technical speak that amounted simply to this: the air traffic controllers were taken by surprise and clueless, there were no prior warnings of any scheduled military tests issued, and no one from the military has confided to his agency that “the missile” was ours and launched by mistake. In other words, it was not ours and it was no mistake.
It is sadly ironic that 47 years ago this month, the entirety of America and the world witnessed the murder of a U.S. president in broad daylight. To this day, despite video documentation and numerous eyewitness accounts of the incident, there is no reliable consensus about exactly what happened that day. There are those who believe our government not only lied about the murder of President John F. Kennedy, but some within our government had foreknowledge and were actually complicit. In 1993, it was the bombing of the World Trade Center; in 1995, it was the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City; and of course in 2001, it was the attack on America.
From my perspective as a career investigator, it is my professional opinion that government sanctioned lies have been woven into each of the official explanations offered for those incidents. One need not to believe in any wild conspiracy to recognize the deficiencies in the official investigations. The same goes for this missile “incident.” We are being lied to, either by commission or omission, or simply being told not to believe our lying eyes.
If you believe, like me, that there is a lot taking place behind the curtain of power in a world run by International bankers and the power elite, then you will likely have trouble sleeping tonight. I cannot offer any additional factual or authenticated details of this apparent missile launch in this report, but I have my suspicions. Things do not take place in a vacuum. We are in dire financial trouble as a result of the International banking cartel and the Federal Reserve, and the majority of people are just now starting to awaken to this fact.
Our least transparent president is on a lavish overseas junket, effectively prostrating America before the world as it seems the earth itself is objecting to his presence. A trifecta of earthly revolt or heavenly sign, consisting of a volcano, earthquake and tsunami occurred in Indonesia in the shadow of his arrival. Back at home, it’s merely unexplained missile launches and a earthshaking monetary policy left in his wake. Meanwhile, the news at eleven reassures us that things are looking up.
Things are far from normal or good, regardless of how many more rallies might be scheduled in an effort to “restore sanity” in America. Odd, that. A rally and appeal for the masses to “restore sanity.” Perhaps it was more of an appeal not to look behind the curtain, and to convince people that should we see anything that might resemble a missile off our shores, we should keep shopping because everything is all under control.
I do believe if we make it through this and next years Thanksgiving and Christmas , we should really give thanks to the Lord and God,for all the ones we've been blessed to celebrate here in America before it ALL ends...Amen...stay vigilant and God Be With Ye...truly Karl.
Of missiles & money - don’t ask, won’t tell
By Doug Hagmann Wednesday, November 10, 2010
A person of normal sensibilities would have to be intellectually numb, overly medicated or otherwise too preoccupied with keeping food on the table and the proverbial wolves from their door not to realize that there is something very, very wrong going on today. By now, most Americans have heard about the sighting of what appears to be a missile, and a big one at that, apparently being launched from a location about 35 miles off the coast of Los Angeles near sunset last evening. Video of the incident was taken from a KCBS news helicopter flying over the mainland at the time.
The manner in which this story unfolded should be a story by itself. The corporate media, quick to comment on the culturally indigenous dancing rituals of U.S. royalty, were quite slow on the uptake on an issue that has serious national security implications in light of our government’s response to this incident.
Today, Americans were treated with a number of explanations from our government officials, military pundits, and even media personalities about the incident. Those explanations range from the “embarrassing if true” to the “downright insulting,” with numerous variations in between. Ranging from having no information on the incident, to assurances that an investigation is underway, and my personal favorite, it is the contrail from an airplane that caused an optical illusion due to a problem of visual perspective, we are either in a boatload of trouble with regard to our national defense, or the hubris of the power elite is at an all time high.
As news of the event began to appear in the media, I contacted several well placed and trusted intelligence and military sources in an effort to determine the truth about the incident. These sources, as I was reminded by one during our conversation, are risking their careers to talk to me. And they talk to me not because of my charm or influence, both of which I admittedly lack, but because they care about the current status and future of our great country. And there is no better reason. I was less than reassured from what I learned today.
“There was an air of deep concern among the officials”
According to one source within the Pentagon, many of the top brass were in unscheduled, high level meetings throughout the day. Although he was not privy to the information imparted during these meetings, he told me that “there was an air of deep concern among the officials,” and all participants had a DAWT policy (don’t ask because I won’t tell) policy. Surreal was just one of the adjectives amply used by my Pentagon source.
At the very least, according to this source, it was a missile. As to whether it was ours or theirs, he does not know. But he said “they do,” a reference to the brass. The rumors circulating “within the [Pentagon] rings” suggest that it was a deliberate launch of a missile from “Chinese property at sea” intended as a warning to the U.S. Although it was odd that he would not clarify the nature of the “Chinese property,” I can only assume that it did not originate from Catalina Island or U.S. military ships in the area, as we still own those, at least to my knowledge.
A domestic intelligence source speaking to me off the record acknowledged the event by his assurances that it was indeed “some type of large missile” and not an illusion or model rocket. This, according to information from his superiors, who are deeply rooted inside the beltway. He provided a lot of technical speak that amounted simply to this: the air traffic controllers were taken by surprise and clueless, there were no prior warnings of any scheduled military tests issued, and no one from the military has confided to his agency that “the missile” was ours and launched by mistake. In other words, it was not ours and it was no mistake.
It is sadly ironic that 47 years ago this month, the entirety of America and the world witnessed the murder of a U.S. president in broad daylight. To this day, despite video documentation and numerous eyewitness accounts of the incident, there is no reliable consensus about exactly what happened that day. There are those who believe our government not only lied about the murder of President John F. Kennedy, but some within our government had foreknowledge and were actually complicit. In 1993, it was the bombing of the World Trade Center; in 1995, it was the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City; and of course in 2001, it was the attack on America.
From my perspective as a career investigator, it is my professional opinion that government sanctioned lies have been woven into each of the official explanations offered for those incidents. One need not to believe in any wild conspiracy to recognize the deficiencies in the official investigations. The same goes for this missile “incident.” We are being lied to, either by commission or omission, or simply being told not to believe our lying eyes.
If you believe, like me, that there is a lot taking place behind the curtain of power in a world run by International bankers and the power elite, then you will likely have trouble sleeping tonight. I cannot offer any additional factual or authenticated details of this apparent missile launch in this report, but I have my suspicions. Things do not take place in a vacuum. We are in dire financial trouble as a result of the International banking cartel and the Federal Reserve, and the majority of people are just now starting to awaken to this fact.
Our least transparent president is on a lavish overseas junket, effectively prostrating America before the world as it seems the earth itself is objecting to his presence. A trifecta of earthly revolt or heavenly sign, consisting of a volcano, earthquake and tsunami occurred in Indonesia in the shadow of his arrival. Back at home, it’s merely unexplained missile launches and a earthshaking monetary policy left in his wake. Meanwhile, the news at eleven reassures us that things are looking up.
Things are far from normal or good, regardless of how many more rallies might be scheduled in an effort to “restore sanity” in America. Odd, that. A rally and appeal for the masses to “restore sanity.” Perhaps it was more of an appeal not to look behind the curtain, and to convince people that should we see anything that might resemble a missile off our shores, we should keep shopping because everything is all under control.
I do believe if we make it through this and next years Thanksgiving and Christmas , we should really give thanks to the Lord and God,for all the ones we've been blessed to celebrate here in America before it ALL ends...Amen...stay vigilant and God Be With Ye...truly Karl.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
That "Gut-Feeling" ....a "False Flag"?
I've been on the Internet , doing some "checking up"on current "events". My friend says every time they send up the space shuttle , a "catastrophe" occurs . "THE" "LAST" shuttle launch was scheduled for 2 November 2010. It has been delayed till 4 November 2010 at approximately 5:30 am (GMT) . There has been also been reported earthquake activity ALL across the U.S. this week . Pay attention to how many people say they feel dizzy , vertigo and nausea . Obama and Co. are leaving for Mumbai , India around the 5th of November 2010 . I've been hearing rumors of "underground" activity in Wyoming for over a year now . And as you know the "Powers that Be" are fascinated by "odd" numbers , especially numbers 11 and 33 , well the exact opposite of 9-11 is 11-9 . Remember on my earlier post (Baby CHEYENNE and Oath Keepers) that I had this "BAD" feeling something bad was going to happen that will leave an effect on the world that will be 3x worse than 9-11. On my Facebook page , I read either Truthout or Butlin Cat's posts about the "3x" effect. Well the election "distraction" is all but over , the power party's are "still partying". Nothing "changed" YET ! Hoosiers remember the 2008 election and Hillary(she IS LUCIFERIAN)(Unlimited Access by FBI agent Gary Aldrich) bringing up the fact that "Magnequench" of Valpraiso was sold to the Chinese , the company makes "rare"earth magnets for "smart"(?) bombs . Military officials are only now conducting an inventory of where and how U.S. suppliers use the obscure but essential substances -- including those that silence the whoosh of Boeing Co. helicopter blades, direct Raytheon Co. missiles and target guns in General Dynamics Corp. tanks. I hope I'm wrong , nobody wants to be "right" on feeling a catastrophic world event is about to "happen" ! There are supposed to be 34 warships off the coast of India and 3000+ people and extra "aircraft" with vehicles and armory . He is about to face the issue about his "fake" birth certificate . I came across a "strange" but, bona fide case , I believe was filed in West Virginia , that addresses the issue of "citizenship" and if Obama got into the Presidency , let alone the Whitehouse , that crime would be so egregious that he would face the death penalty for being a "DOMESTIC ENEMY" and traitor of the united States (300 million corpus dilecti). Of course you been hearing about the bombs being found on UPS airplanes from Saudi Arabia and the bombs being attributed to "al quada" . I guess EVERY terrorist act is going to be attributed to "al quada", I think NOT ! If you want the"TRUTH" , you HAVE to SEEK IT ! It will NOT be hand delivered to you ! The only way to prove the "Bible" a work of Non-Fiction , is for ME and MY people to be right ! The world as we "Knew" it HAS to END , I hate to say . ....stay vigilant....and say your prayers...sincerely Karl
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)