GreenMtnBoyz: In the Defense for Mathew otf Adkins Clark Clounty Indiana

STATE OF INDIANA

CLARK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 4

Case Nos.10C03-1110-FD-001349

10C04-1208-FC-195

10C04-1011-FC-694

10C04-1110-FD-001651

Mathew P. Adkins AFFIANT / MOVANT

Judicial Officer Vicki Carmichael DEFENDANTS

Nathan Bradley Masingo Public Defender /Attorney Of Record

Magistrate Kenneth Abbott

Judicial Officer Joseph P Weber

Clark County Public Defenders Office ,Inc.

And all other officers involved :

MOTION DEMANDING DISMISSAL OF CHARGES

FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT

JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS AND CONSPIRACY

Now comes the Affiant , a flesh and blood man in the image of God , and for his motion states as follows : without admitting jurisdiction of this court that evidence will be entered into the record to prove that Nathan Masingo is a Freemason of the 33^rd degree Shriner which is in direct conflict with his oath to the united states constitution and the Indiana Constitution . An abrogation of the Indiana Canons Of Judicial Conduct. All this with the knowledge of Judge Vicki Carmichael (also a Mason , a member of Rotary Club International chartered by a Chicago Freemason in 1905 by Paul P. Harris, an attorney) , Deputy Prosecutor Attorneys Dawn Elston and Jeremy Mull , all acting “Under Color Of Law” giving the “appearance” of “justice”. That Nathan Masingo was a former deputy prosecuting attorney working along side of Dawn Elston and Jeremy Mull . All these “actors” of the de facto court are guilty of the legal maxim “guilt by association”. All having personal knowledge of these facts as Judge Vicki Carmichael , Lonnie Cooper , Mitchele Harlan , Nathan Masingo , William Dawkins and Jeremy Mull all working together in the same offices both in the courthouse and outside the courthouse . Since the very first actions of the court all the way back to 2007 , information has come to the affiant , that explains the corrupt behavior and abuse of power and office that has caused oppression , irreparable harm and injustice to the body and spirit / soul of Mathew Adkins .

Nathan Masingo’s Masonic Oath , from the Masonic Handbook on page 74 states in part ,”If your wife , or child , or friend should ask you anything about your initiation , you must deliberately lie about it , it is part of your obligation “.

Masingo’s Masonic Oath , from the Masonic Handbook on page 183 states in part : “You must conceal all crimes of brother Masons , except murder and treason , and these only at your option , and should you be summonsed as a witness against a brother Mason , be always sure to shield him . Prevaricate , don’t tell the truth in this case , keep his secrets , forget the important parts . It may be perjury to do this , it is true , but your only keeping your obligations”. Continuing from page 184 of The Masonic Handbook : “If you cheat , wrong or defraud any other society or individual , it is entirely your own business . If you cheat government even , Masonry cannot and will not touch you , but be careful not to cheat , wrong or defraud another Mason or lodge . Whoever else you defraud , live up to your obligations” . (This courtesy even extends to women members of The Order of the Eastern Star and other Masonic organizations for women )

Another solemn oath that a Mason has to abide by is if ever asked if they are a Freemason , that they are to neither confirm or deny being a Freemason .

It has become common . public knowledge , through several former high-ranking Masons who have returned to the practice of the Christian religion and have published books on their experience as former Masonic Lodge members , that high ranking Masons , such as Nathan Masingo, swear the Kol Nidre oath , swearing in part : “All vows , oaths , anathemas , pledges of all names , which we have vowed , sworn or bound ourselves to , from this day of atonement until the next day of atonement we repent aforehand of them all , they shall be deemed absolved , forgiven , annulled , void , and made of no effect , they shall not be binding , nor have any power , the vows shall not be reckoned vows , the obligations shall not be obligations , or the oaths considered oaths”.

It is of great importance that emergency action be taken on this cause so as not to keep Mathew Adkins life in peril and danger of retaliation from even the extreme possibility of murder by members of the Masonic Brotherhood , since an assassination attempt was made on Mathew Adkins life , by being shot six times with large caliber handguns , orchestrated on July 1^st 2010 with those two assassins STILL AT LARGE , having NEVER BEEN APPREHENDED and brought to “justice”. And because it is also public knowledge that ALL POLICE OFFICERS belong to the FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE LODGES across the United States , all being Masonic lodges with constitutions and sworn members . The same is true of ALL sheriffs across the United States as sheriffs belong to the same lodges . This information was verified by Sheriff Glenn Meredith , past president of the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge in Louisville Kentucky . That “criminal informants”(paid) and ‘snitches’ (“deals”) work hand in hand with law enforcement , including making “sanctioned” ‘hits” upon “TARGETED INDIVIDUALS” 1 , such as Mathew Adkins has become . All this goes back to when Mathew Adkins first got in legal peril and Mitchele Harlan was asked by Mathew Adkins stepfather to represent Mathew in his legal charges , as Mitchele Harlan owed $800.00 from monies Mitchele Harlan absconded with in a few years prior from another case Mitch ‘conspired” and caused great harm to financially and in both Mathew’s and his stepfathers safety and security . Mathews stepfather told Mitchele Harlan , a public defender , that he could remedy the $800.00 owed by representing Mathew Adkins in the beginning of his legal woes in 2007 . When Mathew Adkins stepfather found out that Mitchele Harlan was conspiring against him and Mathew and didn’t have Malpractice Insurance and was “practicing “Indiana Eugenics”, Mitchele Harlan was called out on his complicity in open court , causing Mathew’s stepfather to be illegally arrested and unlawfully imprisoned . This being a conspiracy between Mitchele Harlan and Magistrate William Dawkins approximately January 17^th 2008 . It is no secret that Clark County has a hatred and indifference of the people from the Portland neighborhood of Louisville Kentucky , which is where Mathew Adkins had lived at times and where Timothy O’Meara lived at one time , a suicide victim of the Clark County Jail in 2007 and with the representation of Jeff Wenning , resulted in a six (6) figure settlement in late 2007 by Mayor Tom Galligan . The victim Timothy O’Meara being from Portland also , was brought into the Clark county Hospital being deceased from choking on a completely whole hard shell taco , from having ‘forgot’ how to swallow from the “Eugenic” neuroleptic medication being given to O’Meara and upon an autopsy , was found to have ingested a solid complete plastic fork/spoon given to the inmates to eat with . This behavior is the normal , everyday , routine – business – as – usual for the apathetic , discriminating and badly trained and supervised “Corrections” officers of the Clark County Jail . So , to prevent the potential negligent and or intentional suicide / murder of Mathew Adkins and in the best interest of justice and the taxpayers and people of Clark County Indiana . Mathew Adkins should be immediately released and ALL charges dismissed so Mathew Adkins can be treated for his mental and physical medical condition(s) .

1) Charles August Schlund III VS George W. Bush..”targeted individual” ..”gangstalked’..

Cc: Mathew Adkins

Cc; Nathan Masingo

Cc: Jeremy Mull

Cc: Vicki Carmichael

Cc: Sheriff Danny Rodden

Cc: Public At Large

and the affiant further sayeth naught . A motion to DIMISS ALL CHARGES AND IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY being tendered forethwith .

respectfully submitted this _____ day of ______________ 2013

___________________________

Mathew: Adkins propria persona sui juris

Louisville , Kentucky [40212]

CLARK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 4 STATE OF INDIANA

Case Nos.10C03-1110-FD-001349

10C04-1208-FC-195

10C04-1011-FC-694

10C04-1110-FD-001651

Mathew P. Adkins AFFIANT / ACCUSED

Judicial Officer Vicki Carmichael DEFENDANTS

Magistrate William Dawkins

Nathan Bradley Masingo Public Defender /Attorney Of Record

Magistrate Kenneth Abbott

Judicial Officer Joseph P Weber

Clark County Public Defenders Office ,Inc.

And any other officer involved

Upon Affiants motion and reviewing the record and being sufficiently advised

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT THE AFFIANTS :

MOTION DISMISSAL OF CHARGES

AND IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY

This order is final and appealable order and being no just cause for delay .

Tendered by: Judges signature______________________

_____________________ Date________________________________

Mathew : Adkins pro per

Louisville , Kentucky [40212]

STATE OF INDIANA

CLARK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 4

Case Nos. 10C04-1110-FD-001651

Mathew P. Adkins AFFIANT / ACCUSED

Judicial Officer Vicki Carmichael DEFENDANTS

Magistrate William Dawkins

Nathan Bradley Masingo Public Defender /Attorney Of Record

Magistrate Kenneth Abbott

Judicial Officer Joseph P Weber

Clark County Public Defenders Office ,Inc.

And any other officer involved

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF CHARGES

AND IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY

***************

Upon motion of the Affiant and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised ,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT THE AFFIANTS :

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF CHARGES

AND IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY

This is a final and appealable order and there being no just cause for delay .

_____________________________________

VICKI CARMICHAEL JUDGE

CLARK CIRCUIT COURT 4

TENDERED BY DATE_______________________________

_____________________

GREGORY SNYDER P.O.A. for

MATHEW ADKINS

Louisville , Kentucky [40212]

STATE OF INDIANA

CLARK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 4

Case Nos.10C03-1110-FD-001349

10C04-1208-FC-195

10C04-1011-FC-694

10C04-1110-FD-001651

10C01-1110-FD-1651

Mathew P. Adkins AFFIANT / ACCUSED

Judicial Officer Vicki Carmichael DEFENDANTS

Nathan Bradley Masingo Public Defender /Attorney Of Record

Magistrate Kenneth Abbott

Judicial Officer Joseph P Weber

Clark County Public Defenders Office ,Inc.

And all other officers involved :

MOTION DEMANDING DISMISSAL OF CHARGES

FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT

JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS AND CONSPIRACY

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DISMISSAL AND IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FROM CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT

MEMORANDUM

JUDICIAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, by the AFFIANT / ACCUSED, Mathew Adkins in inpropria persona (my own proper self) that due to fraud, which stems from the court and state not having jurisdiction to move and that the actors / impersonators of the court(s) have deteriorated to the point of meeting the criteria of “The Clearfield Doctrine” In support of this notice, the accused / affiant will state as follows:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS

1.) All crimes are commercial (see 27 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 72.11), and all law is contract; therefore, this refusal is partly based upon Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C. 3-501), which warrants refusal of instruments which are non-bona fide or fraudulent in nature.

2.) “For a crime to exist there must be an injured party (Corpus Delicti). There can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of this Constitutional Right.” (See Sherer v. Cullen 481 F. 945.) The STATE OF INDIANA is not the injured party (corpus delicti) in this case and can never be because the STATE OF INDIANA is a sub-corporation under the UNITED STATES, which is a federal corporation according to Title 28 USC section 3002 (15)(A). Also see, William Dixon v. The United States, 1 Marsh 117, 181 (1811), Justice John Marshall explained that "The United States" was a corporation and all of the politicians were the officers of that corporation. A Corporation is dead or artificial at law because it is not real. Hence, the Latin word, “corpse,” which means dead body. The word corporation is derived from the Latin word corpse, so the significance of the etymology of the word corpse is very clear when proving that a corporation is not real because it is dead.

3.) The 11th Amendment under the US Constitution reads as follows: “The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.”

4.) On December 9, 1945, International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. This law makes all public officials foreign citizens, barring them from judicial power. All public officials are administrative agents of the US Corporation. They have no judicial power whatsoever.

5.) 22 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 92.12-92.31 FR Heading “Foreign Relationship” states that oath is required to take office.

6.) Title 8 USC 1481 states, once oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus the oath taker becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, even all political subdivisions; i.e., every single court is considered a separate foreign entity.

7.) Title 22 USC, “Foreign Relations and Intercourse”, Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

8.) All "judicial power" of the "inferior courts" comes from the Judiciary Act of 1789, as did the Attorney General position. "Judicial power" comes from Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. The Eleventh Amendment removed all "judicial power" in law, equity, treaties, contract law, and the right of the State to bring suit against the People. The positions of Attorney General and Prosecutor, of both the United States and the several states, come under the Judicial Branch not the Executive branch of the government. All attorneys come under the Judicial Branch and are judicial officers under the Supreme Court, not under the Secretary of State as licensed professionals, which means they can only represent the Court and not the People or the State. The Eleventh Amendment removed all "judicial power" from the "inferior courts" and the prosecutor’s office as well as from all court officers in law, equity, and so forth.

9.) The Eleventh Amendment also makes a foreign state separation from the position of the Public Office positions to throw off the People. The People have Eleventh Amendment immunity, because there is no "JUDICIAL POWER" of the "inferior courts" and the People have Foreign Sovereign Immunity.

10.) The accused/affiant holds the inherent right of the 11th Amendment, which states in part: “The judicial power shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted by a Foreign State.”

11.) Municipal, county, or state court lacks jurisdiction to hear any case under the foreign state definitions, coming from the 11th Amendment under the US Constitution. This jurisdiction lies with the United States District Court under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) Statutes pursuant to 28 USC 1330.

12.) The fact that public officials are not citizens, but rather, foreign citizens, all of the cases must be dismissed because the court lacked and lacks jurisdiction to enforce judicial power. This court is an administrative court and not a criminal court. In other words, no judicial power makes this court an administrative court. Also, this following act proves that this court is an administrative agency: The Administrative Procedures Act, Title 5 - Government Organization and Employees Administrative Procedures Act part I - the agencies generally chapter 5 subchapter ii - administrative procedure º551. Definitions. For the purpose of this subchapter - * (1) ''agency'' means each authority of the Government of the United States, whether or not it is within or subject to review by another agency.

Additionally, "Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 495 F 2d 906, 910. And the court cannot ignore lack of jurisdiction. "There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. U.S. 474 2D 215.

A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is a nullity. [A judgment shown to be void for lack of personal service on the defendant is a nullity.] Sramek v. Sramek, 17 Kan. App. 2d 573, 576-77, 840 P.2d 553 (1992), rev. denied 252 Kan. 1093 (1993).

"A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. It is clear and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court", Old Wayne Mut. L. Assoc. v. McDonough, 204 U. S. 8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907).

"Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal." Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp. 478 So. 2d. 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)

"Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided." Maine v Thiboutot 100 S. Ct. 250.

"A universal principle as old as the law is that proceedings of a court without jurisdiction are a nullity and its judgment therein without effect either on person or property." Norwood v. Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732.

"Jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear is void ab initio." In Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846.

"Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to act, its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term." Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27.

If any Tribunal (court) finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over a person and subject matter, the case must be dismissed. (See Louisville v. Motley 2111 US 149, 29S. CT 42. “The Accuser Bears the Burden of Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”.

When a suit is brought and determined in a court which has no jurisdiction in the matter, then it is said to be coram non judice, and the judgment is void.” (See Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, 13th Reprint (1998)).

"Where there is no jurisdiction there is no judge; the proceeding is as nothing. Such has been the law from the days of the Marshalsea, 10 Coke 68; also Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall 335,351." Manning v. Ketcham, 58 F.2d 948.

“Without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences are considered, in law, as trespasser.” (See Elliot vs. Piersol, 1 pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328).

The Clearfield Doctrine The Clearfield Doctrine proves when governments descend to the corporate level they CEASE to be governmental entities.

It is well settled that an officer must be either elected, appointed or commissioned. Employees cannot be made officers “by virtue of their employment.” Even if they could,
The Clearfield Doctrine is explicit. The corporation registered and known as JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA .The following is the DUNS number for JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA

501 E COURT AVE STE 253, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304045 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 275, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304038 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 260, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304029

is listed as a ”CORPORATION” in the DUN & BRADSTREET BUSINESS (COMPANY) ENTITY database and is, therefore, “an entity entirely separate from government.” Notwithstanding any other INDIANA Code section that is also superseded by Federal law, the alleged officers are NOT even employees of a “governmental entity.”

Indiana Code Ann. § 2-7-1-14 "Public official" means an individual who holds office in the executive, judicial, or legislative branch of the state or federal government or a political subdivision of either of those governments and includes an official or employee of a state educational institution.

“ . . . the government descended to the level of a mere private corporation and takes on the character of a mere private citizen . . . For the purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as an entity entirely separate from government.” Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank, 9 Wheat. 22 U.S. 904, U.S. v. Erie Ry Co., 106 U.S. 327; Clearfield Trust Co. v. U.S. 318 U.S. 363 (1943).

“When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation.” U.S. v. Burr. 309 U.S. 22; See 22 U.S.C.A. 286e. Bank of U.S. v. Planters Bank of Georgia. 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; 22 U.S.C.A. 286 et. Seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103.

An officer is defined as“a person appointed or elected to a position of responsibility or authority in government or a private organization.” Random House Webster’s Dictionary of the Law, p. 307.

TREZEVANT CASE DAMAGE AWARD STANDARD

"Evidence that motorist cited for traffic violation was incarcerated for 23 minutes during booking process, even though he had never been arrested and at all times had sufficient cash on hand to post bond pending court disposition of citation, was sufficient to support finding that municipality employing officer who cited motorist and county board of criminal justice, which operated facility in which motorist was incarcerated, had unconstitutionally deprived motorist of his right to liberty. 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1983." Trezevant v. City of Tampa (1984) 741 F.2d 336, hn. 1

"Jury verdict of $25,000 in favor of motorist who was unconstitutionally deprived of his liberty when incarcerated during booking process following citation for traffic violation was not excessive in view of evidence of motorist's back pain during period of incarceration and jailor's refusal to provide medical treatment, as well as fact that motorist was clearly entitled to compensation for incarceration itself and for mental anguish that he had suffered from entire episode. 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1983." Trezevant v. City of Tampa (1984) 741 F.2d 336, hn. 5

WE created the government to SECURE our rights. That is the sole purpose! We need to withdraw our consent to the perverted mutated government. In its current form, predatory corporations, it HAS become destructive to the ends of its institution. It no longer secures our rights, it takes them away! No one can argue with that. So we need to exercise our Right to alter or abolish it, just as the Unanimous Declaration says:

"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

BUT, it must be done respectfully, in a civilized manner, and by an ORDERLY TRANSITION, not by a bloody revolution. After all the world is watching and as the Declaration says,

"a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

… and last , but not least … from the Vatican

A MOTU PROPRIO

September 1, 2013, all the judges, lawyers, police, government officials, and those posing

as government officials, and all officers of corporate franchises and entities organized

under the auspices of the UNITED STATES and its STATE franchises become fully,

personally, and commercially liable for their actions and omissions against the living

beneficiaries of the public trusts.

pope removed the immunities , because it places them above the law , = no man is above the law

A MOTU PROPRIO is the highest form of legal instrument on the planet in accordance to its provenance, influence and structure to the Western-Roman world, over riding anything that could be issued by the United Nations, the Inner and Middle Temple, the Crown of Great Britain or any other Monarch and indeed by any head of state or body politic. Anyone holding an office anywhere in the world is also subject to these limits and that immunity no longer applies……..In any event this document issued by Pope Francis is historic on multiple levels, but most significant above all others in that it recognizes the supremacy of the Golden Rule, The "color of law" will no longer be sanctioned, only the"Rule of Law." "Title 22 USC, “Foreign Relations and Intercourse”, Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents."

WHEREFORE, notice is hereby given that based upon the foregoing facts and the authorities cited therein, this AFFIANT / ACCUSED , must be released immediately without further harm from the tortuous cruel and unusual punishment .

Cc: Mathew Adkins

Cc: Jeremy Mull

Cc: Public At Large

and the affiant further sayeth naught . Moves the court to DIMISS ALL CHARGES AND IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY having been tendered forethwith .

respectfully submitted this _____ day of ______________ 2013

Mathew: Adkins propria persona sui juris

Louisville , Kentucky [40212]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Judicial Notice has been furnished by US Mail to: The Clerk of The Circuit Court of Clark County, 501 East Court Avenue Jeffersonville , Indiana 47130 on this _day of _________ 2013.

Respectfully Submitted
by: ____________________________
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice;
U.C.C. 1-207/1- 308, U.C.C. 1-103.
Mathew : Adkins
Non-Domestic Mail

Louisville , Kentucky [40212]

STATE OF INDIANA

CLARK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 4

Case Nos.10C03-1110-FD-001349

10C04-1208-FC-195

10C04-1011-FC-694

10C04-1110-FD-001651

Mathew P. Adkins AFFIANT / ACCUSED

Judicial Officer Vicki Carmichael DEFENDANTS

Nathan Bradley Masingo Public Defender /Attorney Of Record

Magistrate Kenneth Abbott

Judicial Officer Joseph P Weber

Clark County Public Defenders Office ,Inc.

Judicial Officer Daniel Moore

And all other officers involved :

NOTICE OF SANCTION AND APPLICATION

OF TREZEVANT VS CITY OF TAMPA

for UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT and MALFEASANCE OF OFFICE

and OPPRESSION UNDER COLOR OF LAW

CONSPIRACY and FRAUD

Since no administrative judicial officer has the courage or wants to do what’s right in the interest of justice and make a lawful ruling on the previous motion with a supplemental memorandum submitted on August 14^th , 2013 and the Memorandum in Support on September 9^th , 2013 . “The “clock”will begin to toll on October 9^th , 2013 and at 12:00 AM at the rate of $25,000.00 for every 23 minutes held illegally under cruel and unusual punishment . Or the rate will be rounded off to the nearest minute and dollar amount ( $1086.95 per minute) , payable in Federal Reserve Notes or $1.00 U.S. coin , a Treasury Direct Account aka:TDA - Cesta Que Trust account ,and or Silver immediately from the Risk Management , The Treasurer and Insurance ( like Lloyd’s Of London , Citi-Group , Wassau , Farm Bureau Insurance , etc….need I remind everybody here that the court is operating under the “Clearfield Doctrine” and what I’m dealing with is a “COMPANY”/ CORPORATION with Dun and Bradstreet stock bond numbers . It is well settled that an officer must be either elected, appointed or commissioned. Employees cannot be made officers “by virtue of their employment.” Even if they could,
The Clearfield Doctrine is explicit. The corporation registered and known as JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA .The following is the DUNS number for JUDICIARY COURTS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA

501 E COURT AVE STE 253, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304045 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 275, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304038 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 260, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304029

is listed as a ”CORPORATION” in the DUN & BRADSTREET BUSINESS (COMPANY) ENTITY database and is, therefore, “an entity entirely separate from government.” Notwithstanding any other INDIANA Code section that is also superseded by Federal law, the alleged officers are NOT even employees of a “governmental entity.”

Clark Circuit Court No. 1 September 10th 9AM 10C01-1208-FC-000195

Charges: Adkins, Matthew Phillip Statute Level Date

1. 35-44.1-1-3-4(a)/FC: Escape 35-44.1-1-3-4(a) Felony C 07/31/2012

2. 35-44.1-1-3-4(c)/FD: Failure to Return to Lawful Detention Felony D 07/31/2012

3. 35-50-2-8(a)/: Habitual Offender 35-50-2-8(a) No State Code 07/31/2012

08/06/2013 PreTrial Conference (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Carmichael, Vicki L)

06/11/2013 Reset by Court to 08/06/2013

08/06/2013 Motion Filed By Defendant, Demanding Dismissal Of Charges,

Order Submitted.

08/14/2013 Transfer Case Judge Carmichael recuses and orders this cases

transferred to the Clark Circuit Court No. 1.

08/14/2013 Motion to Withdraw Appearance Filed by Nathan Masingo, PD for

Def. Orders submitted.

Filed By: Masingo, Nathan Bradley

File Stamp: 08/06/2013

08/14/2013 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw Appearance (Judicial Officer: Carmichael, Vicki L )

of Nathan Masingo as PD for Def.

08/19/2013 Case Transferred In

Per instr. of 10C04, orig. case <10C04-1208-FC-195> is transferred in to 10C01 from 10C04. NEW CASE #: 10C01-1208-FC-195. Clerical notice issued to parties.

09/10/2013 Jury Trial (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Carmichael, Vicki L)

09/03/2013 Hearing Scheduling Activity

Jury Trial scheduled for 09/10/2013 at 9:30 AM was cancelled. Reason: Change of Court.

09/10/2013 CANCELED Jury Trial (9:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Carmichael, Vicki L)

Change of Court

Jill E. Petersen 812-285-6264(W)

501 East Court Avenue

Room 215, County Government Building

Jeffersonville, IN 47130

Ind. Code Ann. § 2-7-1-14

Cc: CLARK COUNTY COURT , INC.

Cc: CLARK COUNTY PROSECUTOR ,INC.

Cc: SHERIFF DANNY RODDEN

dba: CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF , INC.

Cc; MATHEW ADKINS FILE

Cc: FOR PUBLICATION

Tendered by GREG SNYDER P.O.A.

For Mathew otf adkins

Mathew : adkins

c/o Greg : snyder

Louisville , Kentucky

[40212]

GreenMtnBoyz

About Me

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

In the Defense for Mathew otf Adkins Clark Clounty Indiana

The Clearfield Doctrine The Clearfield Doctrine proves when governments descend to the corporate level they CEASE to be governmental entities.

501 E COURT AVE STE 253, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304045 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 275, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304038 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 260, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304029

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Judicial Notice has been furnished by US Mail to: The Clerk of The Circuit Court of Clark County, 501 East Court Avenue Jeffersonville , Indiana 47130 on this _day of _________ 2013.

Respectfully Submitted
by: ____________________________
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice;
U.C.C. 1-207/1- 308, U.C.C. 1-103.
Mathew : Adkins
Non-Domestic Mail

Louisville , Kentucky [40212]

501 E COURT AVE STE 253, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304045 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 275, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304038 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 260, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304029

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

In the Defense for Mathew otf Adkins Clark Clounty Indiana

The Clearfield Doctrine The Clearfield Doctrine proves when governments descend to the corporate level they CEASE to be governmental entities.

501 E COURT AVE STE 253, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304045 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 275, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304038 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 260, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304029

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Judicial Notice has been furnished by US Mail to: The Clerk of The Circuit Court of Clark County, 501 East Court Avenue Jeffersonville , Indiana 47130 on this ___day of ___________ 2013.

Respectfully Submitted by: ____________________________ All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice; U.C.C. 1-207/1- 308, U.C.C. 1-103. Mathew : Adkins Non-Domestic Mail Louisville , Kentucky [40212]

501 E COURT AVE STE 253, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304045 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 275, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304038 and 501 E COURT AVE STE 260, JEFFERSONVILLE, Indiana 471304029

No comments:

Post a Comment

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Judicial Notice has been furnished by US Mail to: The Clerk of The Circuit Court of Clark County, 501 East Court Avenue Jeffersonville , Indiana 47130 on this _day of _________ 2013.

Respectfully Submitted
by: ____________________________
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice;
U.C.C. 1-207/1- 308, U.C.C. 1-103.
Mathew : Adkins
Non-Domestic Mail

Louisville , Kentucky [40212]